Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Llanidloes Fancy Dress
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. There's a consensus that this subject belongs in Wikipedia. There's not a consensus as to where. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Llanidloes Fancy Dress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This local party, even if it attracts three times the number of the village's inhabitants, is not notable. Drmies (talk) 23:03, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Llanidloes as it appears to be a significant cultural event for the town. The BBC reports that this street party is one of the largest in Wales, and local press has much more coverage like this. -- Whpq (talk) 12:28, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- keep based on sources found (or merge) (
or perhapskeep depending upon whats in the sources) there is more coverage by third party sources than many other articles that survive AfD. I am gonna go add some now. Active Banana (talk) 01:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Three completely seperate*keep, a mention in The Rough Guides and coverage in local news outlets clearly meets "significant coverage in reliable sources" Active Banana (talk) 02:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep: Per Bananna - Ret.Prof (talk) 01:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CrazyMiner (talk • contribs) 17:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.