Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunger (poem)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Jayanta Mahapatra. Liz Read! Talk! 00:05, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hunger (poem) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
notability; doesn't warrant a seperate article. one of many promotional articles created by a blocked user. Soumyapatra13 (talk) 14:45, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Soumyapatra13 (talk) 14:45, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:50, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per GNG. Herinalian (talk) 19:50, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- merge to Jayanta Mahapatra, decent coverage in reliable sources ie [1], [2]. Described as "one of Mahapatra's most quoted early poems" here (p. 60). Still, would like one or two more sources to clearly establish notability. Eddie891 Talk Work 11:10, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Merge to Jayanta Mahapatra.Lacks sources for standalone article.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need more forthcoming opinions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Garuda Talk! 16:05, 2 March 2025 (UTC) - Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To get back on log, note TK
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:44, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Closer note, I had closed as N/C since the further input was not forthcoming, but Eddie891 raised the potential of consensus on my Talk and I have relisted it for same. No objection to a reclose when folks feel it's settled. Star Mississippi 01:47, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, Soumyapatra13 and Herinalian - pinging to see if y’all are ok with merging to the poet’s article as an alternative to deletion? Eddie891 Talk Work 07:00, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, seems Merge would be better. Soumyapatra13 (talk) 07:55, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.