Talk:Gamergate (harassment campaign): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Ryulong (talk | contribs)
Line 468:
:Three of those four sources are already being used in the article. The only one that's not—medium.com—is a blog written by someone at ''Know Your Meme'', which is not a reliable source. [[WP:NPOV]] doesn't mean that we give every viewpoint an equal say, but rather [[WP:UNDUE|all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources]]. You are right that the majority of sources "present a certain view of GamerGate", and that is how we balance the article. [[User:Woodroar|Woodroar]] ([[User talk:Woodroar|talk]]) 05:12, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
:Get in line with every other dormant account who came back to life to solely express this very flawed opinion. There have been constant calls that the article is biased, but it has been demonstrated that these claims are coming exclusively from members of the movement who want to completely deny that several prominent women have been and are still being harassed not because of what they did in regards to the industry but because they are women. The article does not say that the movement is misogynistic, as everyone like you has been claiming is the reason it is biased. It rather states that a slew of misogynistic attacks accompanied the vaguely defined complaints of journalistic integrity. Not to mention that, and this has been stated by multiple sources, that the whole reason that this started was because Zoe Quinn's ex posted all over the Internet claims that she had slept around on him when any fucking sane person would recognize that he's just a dejected ex lashing out, but instead the movement latched on to the fact that her new partner wrote for Kotaku and that must mean he wrote things about her that gave her an edge in the industry when that was disproven by Totillo, considering there is no fucking review on Kotaku for Depression Quest and in all my fucking conversations on Twitter, they think the fact that Grayson gave Quinn time in his piece to talk about how after the failed reality show she wanted to start her own game jam means jack shit in the long run. You all just want to make this page exclusively about the movement and sweep under the rug all of the negative things that accompanied it and show the movement in a bad light and that's not how things work on Wikipedia.—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">琉竜</font>]]) 05:19, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
:::[[WP:CIVIL|Rude]].--[[User:DavidHOzAu|davidh]].[[User talk:DavidHOzAu|oz]].[[Special:Contributions/DavidHOzAu|au]] 05:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
:Don't bother, mate. Many people before you have tried and failed to improve the article. --[[User:DavidHOzAu|davidh]].[[User talk:DavidHOzAu|oz]].[[Special:Contributions/DavidHOzAu|au]] 05:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 
== It's really hard to keep the article going ==