Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claybourn – Claiborne – Clayborn family
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 17:36, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- Claybourn – Claiborne – Clayborn family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notably, a pure vanity page. Slatersteven (talk) 11:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 23:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 23:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. No coverage indicating notability - all links are to Claybourn Genealogical Society. Tacyarg (talk) 02:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete despite claims in the article I am less than convinced of a unified geneology.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.