Liked by 84 users: 12wq, agenO_on, almdu93, andreas12128, Artist2013, astro224, badger69, bergi_37, billton2021, boylikegirlz, bozo1, brona55, butkut, canna, carlos78, chanchanman, chipnow, costyy, daffy15, darkbladeopiate, deanofode, Deepsurf, Denisdoizo, desmodromic, Dick Sneider, disassociateme, doliprane666, donncalef, eldigitos, enough_for_now, famfan1323, ffox, frambueso, gaatar0, Ghostrider, Giffer, grim666spirit, HiGlove, iamu, IMNoob, James Jameson, Jcush, jdcub, jedor22, JK04, jomom, juliannabeck, Ken Goesting, Kiutu, klamber2, klanobulk, kriztian, leproph, Lockon, mariamyfantasy, Meph, milordrevan, Navarre, nbajordan23, Nickochocbud, Och Nee, ozzydog, peter1963, poper2, PornFiend, rascol, Razzo911, reginold, rogerhnn, ronssmith, shahram82, sheldonk, sirsloth, slavass, t3st3r, tesfan, Torgo, tubysmith, twat, uverton, virtuoz2000, wizard_void, Woden_Woody, xriss
if that's what's called an orgy, it's one of the most useless orgies ever.
Hmmm . . . I've never really pondered whether an orgy should be "useful".
I kind of focused more on, "Was it fun?"
With, perhaps, some historical exceptions. Such as, for example . . .
in the days when Maria Teresa was Queen of Austria
(or, one can assert, Empress of the Austro-Hungarian empire),
she actually created a "Chastity Commission", to at least TRY ("harrumph")
to get people to obey her moral codes.
And, of course, the wags all said it was because she was so danged angry
at her own husband, for doing what royal males pretty much all predictably do . . .
At any rate, the clandestine society of orgy-participants
actually had a practical utility, for THEIR orgies . . .
because, if someone would "dip his wick" into some lady who was NOT his wife . . .
or, if some lady would allow such a thing to be done to her . . .
and, if it was done in fulll view of all the participants . . .
well, then that became a guarantee, and assurance,
that any such newcomer could indeed be trusted.
Which, in any royal court, is a rare and precious thing . . .